Rate one specific process. The result is a planning aid, not a guarantee of savings.
The process follows the same steps most of the time.
The required information already arrives in a structured digital format.
A reviewer can explain what makes an output acceptable.
The task occurs often enough for automation to repay setup effort.
Unusual cases are identifiable and can be routed to a person.
The required tools provide APIs, webhooks, or reliable integrations.
Time, cost, quality, or response speed can be measured before and after.
A human can approve high-impact outputs before action is taken.